| 报告题目 | Biobliometric measures and ethics in scientific publishing |
| 报告人 | Prof. Henrik Rudolph |
| 报告人单位 | Editor-in-Chief, Applied Surface Science. Ministry of Defence, Netherlands |
| 报告时间 | 2018-09-14 |
| 报告地点 | 中国科大东校区材料楼五楼会议室 |
| 主办单位 | 合肥微尺度物质科学国家研究中心、中国科学技术大学化学与材料科学学院 |
| 报告介绍 | Abstract:
“Publish or Perish” is an often-heard expression. It is true that a scientist, who does not publish his or her scientific results in a reputable (electronic) journal, will not receive the necessary recognition or scientific respect as a scientist. In this presentation I will discuss some of the various key parameters that are used in scientific publishing to indicate the impact or success of an author, group of authors or a journal. These are called bibliometric values. I will furthermore discuss ethical issues in scientific publishing and try to illustrate how these two concepts, bibliometric data and ethics, might result in some tough choices for (young) scientist. The increased usage of bibliometric data in performance measurements require them to keep publishing or indeed perish. This presentation is not discipline specific, however, I will also give you a behind-the-scenes look at one of the larger scientific journals from the publisher Elsevier: Applied Surface Science with more than 15000 submission per year and an impact factor of 4.437. |
